<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Future of Spirituality and what is after Postmodernism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.goodmanson.com/church/the-future-of-spirituality-and-what-is-after-postmodernism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.goodmanson.com/church/the-future-of-spirituality-and-what-is-after-postmodernism/</link>
	<description>Church Technology, Internet Ministry &#38; Church Planting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:24:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Javier Marti</title>
		<link>http://www.goodmanson.com/church/the-future-of-spirituality-and-what-is-after-postmodernism/comment-page-1/#comment-28847</link>
		<dc:creator>Javier Marti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 07:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodmanson.com/2007-01/22/the-future-of-spirituality-and-what-is-after-postmodernism/#comment-28847</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi.<br />
I am Javier, the founder of Trendirama.com, a community of online amateur writers. We write about the future of everything, and I would like to invite you guys to write an article on the Trendirama.com website, perhaps &#8220;The future of spiritualism&#8221; there, or whatever you are passionate about? It is up to you, you choose the subject.<br />
You would get a link back when you link to your own article, if you wish.<br />
You can even re-use some of what you have here, in the last part of the article, &#8220;your view and comments&#8221;. That would save you time and still be interesting for readers.<br />
Don‚Äôt underestimate this opportunity!</p>
<p>Failing that, if you like the project and you can help me to promote it -even if you don&#8217;t write-  it would be great.<br />
By making this valuable information available online for free, I truly believe we are helping to make the world a better place.</p>
<p>And you could do your bit for the world too.<br />
Your help is appreciated, and if you let me know your contribution, you&#8217;ll be rewarded appropriately in due time. If you link to us or mention us, we can link you back too.<br />
You can even use our valuable articles on your websites, provided that you link back. Any better offer than that?! :)</p>
<p>Look forward to hearing from you or read your article in Trendirama! Join us!</p>
<p>Best regards<br />
Javier Marti<br />
<a href="http://www.trendirama.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.trendirama.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Javier Marti</title>
		<link>http://www.goodmanson.com/church/the-future-of-spirituality-and-what-is-after-postmodernism/comment-page-1/#comment-27294</link>
		<dc:creator>Javier Marti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 04:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodmanson.com/2007-01/22/the-future-of-spirituality-and-what-is-after-postmodernism/#comment-27294</guid>
		<description>Hi. I am the founder of Trendirama.com, a comunity of online amateur writers. We specialize on the future. I would like to invite you to write an article on our website, perhaps based on what you are mentioning here. Please have a look at our website. 
(And no, this is not spam. I only offer this to a few people a day, who I feel can benefit from it.)
Best regards
Javier Marti
http://www.trendirama.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. I am the founder of Trendirama.com, a comunity of online amateur writers. We specialize on the future. I would like to invite you to write an article on our website, perhaps based on what you are mentioning here. Please have a look at our website.<br />
(And no, this is not spam. I only offer this to a few people a day, who I feel can benefit from it.)<br />
Best regards<br />
Javier Marti<br />
<a href="http://www.trendirama.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.trendirama.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Goodmanson</title>
		<link>http://www.goodmanson.com/church/the-future-of-spirituality-and-what-is-after-postmodernism/comment-page-1/#comment-27192</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Goodmanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 17:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodmanson.com/2007-01/22/the-future-of-spirituality-and-what-is-after-postmodernism/#comment-27192</guid>
		<description>Paul, I couldn&#039;t agree with you more.  Absolutely, I view religion in more groups than the two you mentioned.  For the simplicity of the blog post I didn&#039;t unpack every angle possible as it relates to religion, science and faith.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, I couldn&#8217;t agree with you more.  Absolutely, I view religion in more groups than the two you mentioned.  For the simplicity of the blog post I didn&#8217;t unpack every angle possible as it relates to religion, science and faith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.goodmanson.com/church/the-future-of-spirituality-and-what-is-after-postmodernism/comment-page-1/#comment-27180</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 14:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodmanson.com/2007-01/22/the-future-of-spirituality-and-what-is-after-postmodernism/#comment-27180</guid>
		<description>Sounds like you view religion in terms of two basic groups: Christian believers (I&#039;m guessing evangelical?) and those scientists who aren&#039;t Christian believers. To me, the religious landscape looks more multifaceted than this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like you view religion in terms of two basic groups: Christian believers (I&#8217;m guessing evangelical?) and those scientists who aren&#8217;t Christian believers. To me, the religious landscape looks more multifaceted than this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Church Marketing Sucks</title>
		<link>http://www.goodmanson.com/church/the-future-of-spirituality-and-what-is-after-postmodernism/comment-page-1/#comment-25642</link>
		<dc:creator>Church Marketing Sucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodmanson.com/2007-01/22/the-future-of-spirituality-and-what-is-after-postmodernism/#comment-25642</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;National New Church Conference...&lt;/strong&gt;

In April I will be tag-teaming with the one and only Mark Batterson for a pre-conference session at the National New Church Conference in Orlando, Fla. The pre-conference track is about creative communications in the church. In addition, I will be tag-...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>National New Church Conference&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>In April I will be tag-teaming with the one and only Mark Batterson for a pre-conference session at the National New Church Conference in Orlando, Fla. The pre-conference track is about creative communications in the church. In addition, I will be tag-&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Geisert</title>
		<link>http://www.goodmanson.com/church/the-future-of-spirituality-and-what-is-after-postmodernism/comment-page-1/#comment-25583</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Geisert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodmanson.com/2007-01/22/the-future-of-spirituality-and-what-is-after-postmodernism/#comment-25583</guid>
		<description>I am the Co-Director of The Brights&#039; Net.

I wish to make it clear that The Brights&#039; Net is not, and never has been an anti-religious organization. This is patently clear from a reading of the home page (www.the-brights.net). The purposes of the organization are also clearly stated on the home page:    
1.  Promote the civic understanding and acknowledgment of the naturalistic worldview, which is free of supernatural and mystical elements.
   2. Gain public recognition that persons who hold such a worldview can bring principled actions to bear on matters of civic importance.
   3. Educate society toward accepting the full and equitable civic participation of all such individuals. The Brights&#039; Net is essentially a civic rights organizations, working to create a level playing field for all worldviews (both naturalistic and supernaturalistic).

As an example which you can learn about from the website, we have created a Special Interest Group which is working with a large international religious organization.

This Brights Action SIG-2 is formed specifically to enable a self-designated portion of the Brights&#039; constituency to interact with the United Religion Initiative. The URI organization focuses on uniting peoples of varied worldviews for action, attempting to bridge gaps between human groups in order to harmoniously work together to reduce religiously-motivated violence and advance justice across the globe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am the Co-Director of The Brights&#8217; Net.</p>
<p>I wish to make it clear that The Brights&#8217; Net is not, and never has been an anti-religious organization. This is patently clear from a reading of the home page (www.the-brights.net). The purposes of the organization are also clearly stated on the home page:<br />
1.  Promote the civic understanding and acknowledgment of the naturalistic worldview, which is free of supernatural and mystical elements.<br />
   2. Gain public recognition that persons who hold such a worldview can bring principled actions to bear on matters of civic importance.<br />
   3. Educate society toward accepting the full and equitable civic participation of all such individuals. The Brights&#8217; Net is essentially a civic rights organizations, working to create a level playing field for all worldviews (both naturalistic and supernaturalistic).</p>
<p>As an example which you can learn about from the website, we have created a Special Interest Group which is working with a large international religious organization.</p>
<p>This Brights Action SIG-2 is formed specifically to enable a self-designated portion of the Brights&#8217; constituency to interact with the United Religion Initiative. The URI organization focuses on uniting peoples of varied worldviews for action, attempting to bridge gaps between human groups in order to harmoniously work together to reduce religiously-motivated violence and advance justice across the globe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mouse jockey</title>
		<link>http://www.goodmanson.com/church/the-future-of-spirituality-and-what-is-after-postmodernism/comment-page-1/#comment-25429</link>
		<dc:creator>mouse jockey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 16:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodmanson.com/2007-01/22/the-future-of-spirituality-and-what-is-after-postmodernism/#comment-25429</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lorri,</p>
<p>I‚Äôm glad you say religious belief is comprised of both logic and emotion.  Since you affirm the former, with all due respect, it seems, hidden within your comment, is a contradiction.  With your conviction that ‚Äúno one individual or group of individuals is superior to another‚Äù; I would agree (with one important qualification),  but it seems that your comment is directed not at individuals but at ideas.  And if indeed your comment comprises both individuals and ideas, how do you maintain the integrity (logicality) of the aforementioned statement without invoking the apparent superiority you disdain?  In other words, if you put forth the statement, ‚Äúno one individual‚Ä¶is superior to another,‚Äù aren‚Äôt you just claiming superiority, or at the very least that statement itself is superior?  </p>
<p>If Jesus existed and the history of His actions are somewhat known, then Jesus agrees with you in principle, He was an egalitarian towards individuals but He was an elitist when it comes to ideas.  So I guess the question is, can an individual who is not superior (in substance) to another hold ideas that are superior (in content) to that individual?    </p>
<p>Peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LorriM</title>
		<link>http://www.goodmanson.com/church/the-future-of-spirituality-and-what-is-after-postmodernism/comment-page-1/#comment-25314</link>
		<dc:creator>LorriM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 20:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodmanson.com/2007-01/22/the-future-of-spirituality-and-what-is-after-postmodernism/#comment-25314</guid>
		<description>One can never state with certainty how the future will play out, and all one can do is assume, and assuming is a hindrance where religion is concerned.  It is theory, thought, and often how we would like it to be., based both on logic and emotion.

Spirituality resides in the heart, the soul, and no amount of going to church, synagogue, temple, or religious attendance will put out the illuminations within.

Science may reign, in the future, on the exterior, but what lies inside is what matters.

People of faith, come from diverse backgrounds, cultures, religions.  Who is to say with certainty that one faith is better than the other.  Those who do, go against the very grain of religious belief, and put themselves in a position of superiority.  No one individual or group of individuals is superior to another.  We all bleed the same color blood, and we all need to learn to survive, and live as equals, under the planetary umbrella.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One can never state with certainty how the future will play out, and all one can do is assume, and assuming is a hindrance where religion is concerned.  It is theory, thought, and often how we would like it to be., based both on logic and emotion.</p>
<p>Spirituality resides in the heart, the soul, and no amount of going to church, synagogue, temple, or religious attendance will put out the illuminations within.</p>
<p>Science may reign, in the future, on the exterior, but what lies inside is what matters.</p>
<p>People of faith, come from diverse backgrounds, cultures, religions.  Who is to say with certainty that one faith is better than the other.  Those who do, go against the very grain of religious belief, and put themselves in a position of superiority.  No one individual or group of individuals is superior to another.  We all bleed the same color blood, and we all need to learn to survive, and live as equals, under the planetary umbrella.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Religion Highlights #1 &#124; Open Switch</title>
		<link>http://www.goodmanson.com/church/the-future-of-spirituality-and-what-is-after-postmodernism/comment-page-1/#comment-25293</link>
		<dc:creator>Religion Highlights #1 &#124; Open Switch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 18:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodmanson.com/2007-01/22/the-future-of-spirituality-and-what-is-after-postmodernism/#comment-25293</guid>
		<description>[...] The future of spirituality [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The future of spirituality [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Random Links &#171; Simply Missional</title>
		<link>http://www.goodmanson.com/church/the-future-of-spirituality-and-what-is-after-postmodernism/comment-page-1/#comment-25089</link>
		<dc:creator>Random Links &#171; Simply Missional</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodmanson.com/2007-01/22/the-future-of-spirituality-and-what-is-after-postmodernism/#comment-25089</guid>
		<description>[...] 24 Jan 2007 Random&#160;Links Posted by chrismarlow under Uncategorized&#160;  Drew Goodmanson discusses the The Future ofSpirituality and what is after Postmodernism. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 24 Jan 2007 Random&nbsp;Links Posted by chrismarlow under Uncategorized&nbsp;  Drew Goodmanson discusses the The Future ofSpirituality and what is after Postmodernism. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

