<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Practical Missional Ecclesiology Workshop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.goodmanson.com/church/practical-missional-ecclesiology-workshop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.goodmanson.com/church/practical-missional-ecclesiology-workshop/</link>
	<description>Church Technology, Internet Ministry &#38; Church Planting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:24:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wrestling with the idea of church&#8230; &#171; EmmausLife</title>
		<link>http://www.goodmanson.com/church/practical-missional-ecclesiology-workshop/comment-page-1/#comment-208498</link>
		<dc:creator>Wrestling with the idea of church&#8230; &#171; EmmausLife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 19:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodmanson.com/?p=1319#comment-208498</guid>
		<description>[...] Wrestling with the idea of&#160;church&#8230;  June 2, 2010 Matthew Hansen Leave a comment Go to comments    So lately, many of you know, I&#8217;m wrestling with the idea of church&#8230;I have to be honest&#8230;I get straight up mad sometimes when I am setting around with a group of pastors and topics like: mood, settings, flow, method, model, etc, etc come up&#8230;gone are the days when some crazy freak could say something like, &#8220;hey, why don&#8217;t you eat my flesh and drink my blood&#8230;&#8221; Not sure that really set the mood or flow very well&#8230; I am getting more and more annoyed at, even in the missional church, now pastors better resemble managers, tacticians, and the like as opposed to lovers, prophets, and priests&#8230;Where are the days of leading a church in the manner of Ephesians 4:11 as opposed to those who rouse up a crowd in the arena of youth, singles, and married, based on personality tests, degrees, and skill sets, etc&#8230;What happened to the days when gathering around the Apostles teaching, communion and fellowship were enough and now we need the right music, the right speaker, the right children&#8217;s ministry &#8230;church is just too damn hard&#8230;and gives us a very false sense of success&#8230;to quote a secular author, the moment we begin to quantify we loose it&#8217;s depth&#8230;where did our CEO Ecclesiology even come from? What about a missional (truly missional) Ecclesiology&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wrestling with the idea of&nbsp;church&#8230;  June 2, 2010 Matthew Hansen Leave a comment Go to comments    So lately, many of you know, I&#8217;m wrestling with the idea of church&#8230;I have to be honest&#8230;I get straight up mad sometimes when I am setting around with a group of pastors and topics like: mood, settings, flow, method, model, etc, etc come up&#8230;gone are the days when some crazy freak could say something like, &#8220;hey, why don&#8217;t you eat my flesh and drink my blood&#8230;&#8221; Not sure that really set the mood or flow very well&#8230; I am getting more and more annoyed at, even in the missional church, now pastors better resemble managers, tacticians, and the like as opposed to lovers, prophets, and priests&#8230;Where are the days of leading a church in the manner of Ephesians 4:11 as opposed to those who rouse up a crowd in the arena of youth, singles, and married, based on personality tests, degrees, and skill sets, etc&#8230;What happened to the days when gathering around the Apostles teaching, communion and fellowship were enough and now we need the right music, the right speaker, the right children&#8217;s ministry &#8230;church is just too damn hard&#8230;and gives us a very false sense of success&#8230;to quote a secular author, the moment we begin to quantify we loose it&#8217;s depth&#8230;where did our CEO Ecclesiology even come from? What about a missional (truly missional) Ecclesiology&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Campbell</title>
		<link>http://www.goodmanson.com/church/practical-missional-ecclesiology-workshop/comment-page-1/#comment-208260</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodmanson.com/?p=1319#comment-208260</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this...and all your work on triperspectivalism. It has been a great encouragement for our team, especially the kings who dont seem to understand their importance in the work of the church.

Question. How would you suggest a pastor develop the skills of kings, priests, prophets so each can be better at exercising their gifts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this&#8230;and all your work on triperspectivalism. It has been a great encouragement for our team, especially the kings who dont seem to understand their importance in the work of the church.</p>
<p>Question. How would you suggest a pastor develop the skills of kings, priests, prophets so each can be better at exercising their gifts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Goodmanson</title>
		<link>http://www.goodmanson.com/church/practical-missional-ecclesiology-workshop/comment-page-1/#comment-208022</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Goodmanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodmanson.com/?p=1319#comment-208022</guid>
		<description>David also does that.  There is no &#039;reason&#039; why I do it this way, probably just because I see it as a counter-clockwise flow from the vision, to the motivation that flows out in our behavior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David also does that.  There is no &#8216;reason&#8217; why I do it this way, probably just because I see it as a counter-clockwise flow from the vision, to the motivation that flows out in our behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gardner Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.goodmanson.com/church/practical-missional-ecclesiology-workshop/comment-page-1/#comment-208020</link>
		<dc:creator>Gardner Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodmanson.com/?p=1319#comment-208020</guid>
		<description>Drew, thanks for your work on this, incorporating and &quot;working the angles&quot; in practical, mission-directed, gospel-centered ways.   Frame&#039;s work on perspectivalism has helped us to think out, live out and communicate the gospel in such rich ways.  

One question/comment (as one who suffers Frame-engrained-brain syndrome): Frame puts the existential lower right and situational lower left ... any reason why you have them flipped?  I know it doesn&#039;t matter, it just messed with my kingly consistency meter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drew, thanks for your work on this, incorporating and &#8220;working the angles&#8221; in practical, mission-directed, gospel-centered ways.   Frame&#8217;s work on perspectivalism has helped us to think out, live out and communicate the gospel in such rich ways.  </p>
<p>One question/comment (as one who suffers Frame-engrained-brain syndrome): Frame puts the existential lower right and situational lower left &#8230; any reason why you have them flipped?  I know it doesn&#8217;t matter, it just messed with my kingly consistency meter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

