<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alcohol, Acts 29 &#038; the Gospel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.goodmanson.com/2008-04/03/alcohol-acts-29-the-gospel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.goodmanson.com/2008-04/03/alcohol-acts-29-the-gospel/</link>
	<description>Church Planting, Technology &#038; Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lou G.</title>
		<link>http://www.goodmanson.com/2008-04/03/alcohol-acts-29-the-gospel/#comment-183384</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodmanson.com/2008-04/03/alcohol-acts-29-the-gospel/#comment-183384</guid>
		<description>Drew, you wrote:
"Let me cite a couple goals, one if a brother is weaker, this isn’t the place we should allow them to remain. We should grow these brothers so that they mature in wisdom." 
and
"this can be a slippery slope argument. Meaning, where do we end?"

I think a close reading of Paul in 1 Cor 8 and Romans 14 will answer these questions very well. Paul did not say to "grow these brothers" so that our Christian liberty could be exercised more freely. Instead he said, 1 Cor 8:11 "So this weak brother, for whom Christ died, is destroyed by your knowledge. 12When you sin against your brothers in this way and wound their weak conscience, you sin against Christ. 13Therefore, if what I eat causes my brother to fall into sin, I will never eat meat again, so that I will not cause him to fall."
and 
Romans 14 "All food is clean, but it is wrong for a man to eat anything that causes someone else to stumble. 21 It is better not to eat meat or drink wine or to do anything else that will cause your brother to fall. 

 22 So whatever you believe about these things keep between yourself and God. Blessed is the man who does not condemn himself by what he approves." 


The idea that you think your goal is to grow a weaker brother to partake of alcohol is not what Paul has in mind here. Instead he seems to say that you have a duty to your brother not to push him into what for him is a sin.

I've ministered to lots of guys who've had a chronic struggle with alcohol and if one of them says he doesn't ever want to drink again, I say AMEN to that. I believe these guys' bodies will never handle or process alcohol effeciently again in this life, so we need to be very, very careful about encouraging them to drink again. Their bodies are different from the average person. If you meet a few of them, they can fill you in on all the details.

Take care, Lou G. in VA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drew, you wrote:<br />
&#8220;Let me cite a couple goals, one if a brother is weaker, this isn’t the place we should allow them to remain. We should grow these brothers so that they mature in wisdom.&#8221;<br />
and<br />
&#8220;this can be a slippery slope argument. Meaning, where do we end?&#8221;</p>
<p>I think a close reading of Paul in 1 Cor 8 and Romans 14 will answer these questions very well. Paul did not say to &#8220;grow these brothers&#8221; so that our Christian liberty could be exercised more freely. Instead he said, 1 Cor 8:11 &#8220;So this weak brother, for whom Christ died, is destroyed by your knowledge. 12When you sin against your brothers in this way and wound their weak conscience, you sin against Christ. 13Therefore, if what I eat causes my brother to fall into sin, I will never eat meat again, so that I will not cause him to fall.&#8221;<br />
and<br />
Romans 14 &#8220;All food is clean, but it is wrong for a man to eat anything that causes someone else to stumble. 21 It is better not to eat meat or drink wine or to do anything else that will cause your brother to fall. </p>
<p> 22 So whatever you believe about these things keep between yourself and God. Blessed is the man who does not condemn himself by what he approves.&#8221; </p>
<p>The idea that you think your goal is to grow a weaker brother to partake of alcohol is not what Paul has in mind here. Instead he seems to say that you have a duty to your brother not to push him into what for him is a sin.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve ministered to lots of guys who&#8217;ve had a chronic struggle with alcohol and if one of them says he doesn&#8217;t ever want to drink again, I say AMEN to that. I believe these guys&#8217; bodies will never handle or process alcohol effeciently again in this life, so we need to be very, very careful about encouraging them to drink again. Their bodies are different from the average person. If you meet a few of them, they can fill you in on all the details.</p>
<p>Take care, Lou G. in VA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sdesocio</title>
		<link>http://www.goodmanson.com/2008-04/03/alcohol-acts-29-the-gospel/#comment-175609</link>
		<dc:creator>sdesocio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 01:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodmanson.com/2008-04/03/alcohol-acts-29-the-gospel/#comment-175609</guid>
		<description>Eug,

Thanks for the feedback. Thats a insightful point. Sometimes, when Im on the blogs, I forget that everyone is at different points in their walk with Christ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eug,</p>
<p>Thanks for the feedback. Thats a insightful point. Sometimes, when Im on the blogs, I forget that everyone is at different points in their walk with Christ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Goodmanson</title>
		<link>http://www.goodmanson.com/2008-04/03/alcohol-acts-29-the-gospel/#comment-175566</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Goodmanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 22:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodmanson.com/2008-04/03/alcohol-acts-29-the-gospel/#comment-175566</guid>
		<description>It is “for freedom that Christ has set us free”, but “it is good to not eat meat or drink wine or do anything that causes your brother to stumble.”

Brett - This is a common refrain, so it's a great comment.  Let me cite a couple goals, one if a brother is weaker, this isn't the place we should allow them to remain.  We should grow these brothers so that they mature in wisdom.  

Second, we will need to be wise to create an atmosphere that is demonstrating responsibility and maturity in Christ.  

Thirdly, this can be a slippery slope argument.  Meaning, where do we end?  We have a ministry to reach strippers, if/as they begin to enter into the community and it causes men to lust in their hears do we talk to them right away and request they dress in baggy clothes that cover every square inch?  Is the problem 'out there' or in our hearts?  I don't know if these lines are always so black and white.  But if we are to model a redemptive community we have to wrestle through these issues rather than opt toward abuse or prohibition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is “for freedom that Christ has set us free”, but “it is good to not eat meat or drink wine or do anything that causes your brother to stumble.”</p>
<p>Brett - This is a common refrain, so it&#8217;s a great comment.  Let me cite a couple goals, one if a brother is weaker, this isn&#8217;t the place we should allow them to remain.  We should grow these brothers so that they mature in wisdom.  </p>
<p>Second, we will need to be wise to create an atmosphere that is demonstrating responsibility and maturity in Christ.  </p>
<p>Thirdly, this can be a slippery slope argument.  Meaning, where do we end?  We have a ministry to reach strippers, if/as they begin to enter into the community and it causes men to lust in their hears do we talk to them right away and request they dress in baggy clothes that cover every square inch?  Is the problem &#8216;out there&#8217; or in our hearts?  I don&#8217;t know if these lines are always so black and white.  But if we are to model a redemptive community we have to wrestle through these issues rather than opt toward abuse or prohibition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eug</title>
		<link>http://www.goodmanson.com/2008-04/03/alcohol-acts-29-the-gospel/#comment-175542</link>
		<dc:creator>Eug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 21:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodmanson.com/2008-04/03/alcohol-acts-29-the-gospel/#comment-175542</guid>
		<description>To sdesocio,
  I'm a moderationist and recovering prohibitionist, I didn't start drinking until I was almost 30.  I grew up in a legalistic Fundy church with a father who abused alcohol and self-righteously looked down on all alcohol.  It wasn't until I studied the Reformed theology in Seminary that I started reforming my views on alcohol.  

That said, I think the point that Drew is making is that we can can trade legalistic "prohibition" for a "legalistic moderation" without skipping a beat. 
a.  Towards other Christians that exceed what they consider moderation (ie - Isn't that your 3rd beer in 2 hours?  Did you have sufficient water and food to ensure you're not exceeding moderation? etc.)
b.  Towards other Christians who remain prohibitionist (ie - Well the TRUE biblical view is moderation so STRONG Christians should ALWAYS be moderationist.)

Redeeming celebration works whether you choose to drink or not, whether you are a moderationist or a abstentionist.  I purposely leave out prohibitionist because I don't think it's possible to be holier than Jesus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To sdesocio,<br />
  I&#8217;m a moderationist and recovering prohibitionist, I didn&#8217;t start drinking until I was almost 30.  I grew up in a legalistic Fundy church with a father who abused alcohol and self-righteously looked down on all alcohol.  It wasn&#8217;t until I studied the Reformed theology in Seminary that I started reforming my views on alcohol.  </p>
<p>That said, I think the point that Drew is making is that we can can trade legalistic &#8220;prohibition&#8221; for a &#8220;legalistic moderation&#8221; without skipping a beat.<br />
a.  Towards other Christians that exceed what they consider moderation (ie - Isn&#8217;t that your 3rd beer in 2 hours?  Did you have sufficient water and food to ensure you&#8217;re not exceeding moderation? etc.)<br />
b.  Towards other Christians who remain prohibitionist (ie - Well the TRUE biblical view is moderation so STRONG Christians should ALWAYS be moderationist.)</p>
<p>Redeeming celebration works whether you choose to drink or not, whether you are a moderationist or a abstentionist.  I purposely leave out prohibitionist because I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s possible to be holier than Jesus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Rayl</title>
		<link>http://www.goodmanson.com/2008-04/03/alcohol-acts-29-the-gospel/#comment-174475</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Rayl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 06:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodmanson.com/2008-04/03/alcohol-acts-29-the-gospel/#comment-174475</guid>
		<description>If we were to compare food sacrificed to idols with alcohol (two liberties examined by Paul), then I feel you have done an excellent job showing that an idol "is nothing," but have not dealt with the truth that there are brothers with weaker consciences whom we are called to honor and potentially lay down our rights to serve and maintain unity (we may even be one of these brothers in a given area).  The goal here should be unity in the Gospel by enjoying the good gifts God has given us, while not allowing any of those gifts to wound a weaker brother's conscience.  It is "for freedom that Christ has set us free", but "it is good to not eat meat or drink wine or do anything that causes your brother to stumble."  I'd love to hear more on this perspective, or if I'm really missing the mark.  Thanks for your thoughts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we were to compare food sacrificed to idols with alcohol (two liberties examined by Paul), then I feel you have done an excellent job showing that an idol &#8220;is nothing,&#8221; but have not dealt with the truth that there are brothers with weaker consciences whom we are called to honor and potentially lay down our rights to serve and maintain unity (we may even be one of these brothers in a given area).  The goal here should be unity in the Gospel by enjoying the good gifts God has given us, while not allowing any of those gifts to wound a weaker brother&#8217;s conscience.  It is &#8220;for freedom that Christ has set us free&#8221;, but &#8220;it is good to not eat meat or drink wine or do anything that causes your brother to stumble.&#8221;  I&#8217;d love to hear more on this perspective, or if I&#8217;m really missing the mark.  Thanks for your thoughts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sdesocio</title>
		<link>http://www.goodmanson.com/2008-04/03/alcohol-acts-29-the-gospel/#comment-174404</link>
		<dc:creator>sdesocio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 01:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodmanson.com/2008-04/03/alcohol-acts-29-the-gospel/#comment-174404</guid>
		<description>After your last post it sounded like semantics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After your last post it sounded like semantics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Goodmanson</title>
		<link>http://www.goodmanson.com/2008-04/03/alcohol-acts-29-the-gospel/#comment-174374</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Goodmanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 22:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodmanson.com/2008-04/03/alcohol-acts-29-the-gospel/#comment-174374</guid>
		<description>Ok, I think we are saying the same thing.  I used the term "Moderationist" as those who approach things with a motive toward drinking in moderation vs. redemptively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I think we are saying the same thing.  I used the term &#8220;Moderationist&#8221; as those who approach things with a motive toward drinking in moderation vs. redemptively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sdesocio</title>
		<link>http://www.goodmanson.com/2008-04/03/alcohol-acts-29-the-gospel/#comment-174372</link>
		<dc:creator>sdesocio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 21:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodmanson.com/2008-04/03/alcohol-acts-29-the-gospel/#comment-174372</guid>
		<description>I would say moderation just refers to how much you drink and redemption refers to how and why you drink. If that makes sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say moderation just refers to how much you drink and redemption refers to how and why you drink. If that makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Goodmanson</title>
		<link>http://www.goodmanson.com/2008-04/03/alcohol-acts-29-the-gospel/#comment-174121</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Goodmanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 04:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodmanson.com/2008-04/03/alcohol-acts-29-the-gospel/#comment-174121</guid>
		<description>"Its pretty naive for Christians to not treat alcohol as something that can be used in the wrong way and something that must be treated with care."  

Is that your disagreement?   I hope what I stated is not saying I don't agree with what you said.  

Approaching alcohol redemptively will require people to drink in moderation  but the goals are diff't.  Moderationists (negative) goals are drinking in careful manner, redemptively (positive) goals requires more than this ie. drinking in a way that glorifies God.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Its pretty naive for Christians to not treat alcohol as something that can be used in the wrong way and something that must be treated with care.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Is that your disagreement?   I hope what I stated is not saying I don&#8217;t agree with what you said.  </p>
<p>Approaching alcohol redemptively will require people to drink in moderation  but the goals are diff&#8217;t.  Moderationists (negative) goals are drinking in careful manner, redemptively (positive) goals requires more than this ie. drinking in a way that glorifies God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sdesocio</title>
		<link>http://www.goodmanson.com/2008-04/03/alcohol-acts-29-the-gospel/#comment-174102</link>
		<dc:creator>sdesocio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 01:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodmanson.com/2008-04/03/alcohol-acts-29-the-gospel/#comment-174102</guid>
		<description>Im gonna disagree with one point in a major way. Its pretty naive for Christians to not treat alcohol as something that can be used in the wrong way and something that must be treated with care. 

How is moderation ever a bad thing? 

In fact I would argue that your statement of redeeming Alcohol( a beer or two as from God’s bounty) is simply a declaration promotion moderation. 
Moderation and redemption are not mutually exclusive. Additionally, moderation does not begin with defeat but with respect. It would be like saying when you go to drive a car, if you make rule #1 that you put your seat belt on, you are just settling for the fact that you will crash. 

By that way, just so its made totally clear: I love that God made fermentation. I made beer for Christmas and handed out to non Christians I know telling them to celebrate with this beer the Birth of the Jesus the Savior. Yet, I cannot help but think that moderation is almost always the wisest choice for a Christian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im gonna disagree with one point in a major way. Its pretty naive for Christians to not treat alcohol as something that can be used in the wrong way and something that must be treated with care. </p>
<p>How is moderation ever a bad thing? </p>
<p>In fact I would argue that your statement of redeeming Alcohol( a beer or two as from God’s bounty) is simply a declaration promotion moderation.<br />
Moderation and redemption are not mutually exclusive. Additionally, moderation does not begin with defeat but with respect. It would be like saying when you go to drive a car, if you make rule #1 that you put your seat belt on, you are just settling for the fact that you will crash. </p>
<p>By that way, just so its made totally clear: I love that God made fermentation. I made beer for Christmas and handed out to non Christians I know telling them to celebrate with this beer the Birth of the Jesus the Savior. Yet, I cannot help but think that moderation is almost always the wisest choice for a Christian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
