<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Churches: Breaking the 125 Barrier</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.goodmanson.com/2005-12/10/churches-breaking-the-125-barrier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.goodmanson.com/2005-12/10/churches-breaking-the-125-barrier/</link>
	<description>Church Planting, Technology &#038; Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: D. Goodmanson</title>
		<link>http://www.goodmanson.com/2005-12/10/churches-breaking-the-125-barrier/#comment-3988</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Goodmanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 22:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodmanson.com/?p=322#comment-3988</guid>
		<description>Mike,

Yours is a common response, mostly from preacher/teachers. (David is wired the same way.)  You recognize the intangibles of these barriers from your planting Mars Hill.  I remember before you purchased the Ballard Building (and there was no building) the challenges that led to people leaving the church.  There was a lot of confusion and no one knew where the next Sunday was going to meet.  If things had stayed like that, Mars Hill would have hit a barrier pretty hard.

Of course without the gospel, all of this is meaningless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>Yours is a common response, mostly from preacher/teachers. (David is wired the same way.)  You recognize the intangibles of these barriers from your planting Mars Hill.  I remember before you purchased the Ballard Building (and there was no building) the challenges that led to people leaving the church.  There was a lot of confusion and no one knew where the next Sunday was going to meet.  If things had stayed like that, Mars Hill would have hit a barrier pretty hard.</p>
<p>Of course without the gospel, all of this is meaningless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.goodmanson.com/2005-12/10/churches-breaking-the-125-barrier/#comment-3985</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 17:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodmanson.com/?p=322#comment-3985</guid>
		<description>Dude, when preaching the gospel fails, just go "Purpose Driven." :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, when preaching the gospel fails, just go &#8220;Purpose Driven.&#8221; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.goodmanson.com/2005-12/10/churches-breaking-the-125-barrier/#comment-3984</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodmanson.com/?p=322#comment-3984</guid>
		<description>Helpful post Drew. Becoming a practitioner you soon realise many of your ideals - albeit fine to hold onto and often necessary to do so - are just ideals without legs.  So I value "how-to" theories like this because they often compliment the ideals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Helpful post Drew. Becoming a practitioner you soon realise many of your ideals - albeit fine to hold onto and often necessary to do so - are just ideals without legs.  So I value &#8220;how-to&#8221; theories like this because they often compliment the ideals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
